ESG Across Economies: A Comparative Review of Developed and Developing

Clicks: 1
ID: 313331
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #13 of 14 articles by views in Digital & Social Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study investigates the discourse of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices in developed and developing economies through a systematic literature review (SLR). ESG has emerged as a critical framework for sustainable business practices, yet its adoption and interpretation vary significantly across institutional and economic contexts. The research draws on 20 peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025, systematically identified through leading academic databases, and synthesised using a narrative analysis approach guided by the PRISMA framework. The findings reveal sharp contrasts in ESG discourse. In developed economies, ESG is institutionalised, standardised, and strategically embedded within corporate governance, driven by strong regulatory frameworks, investor activism, and stakeholder accountability. By contrast, ESG practices in developing economies are fragmented, externally influenced, and often symbolic, shaped by international investor demands, donor agencies, and global supply chain pressures. Comparative analysis highlights the risk of a two-tier ESG system, with developed economies setting global benchmarks while developing economies struggle to align due to institutional voids, compliance costs, and capacity constraints. The study contributes to theory by applying stakeholder, legitimacy, and institutional perspectives to explain differences in ESG adoption and discourse. It offers practical implications for policymakers, investors, and corporations, emphasising the need for stronger regulatory frameworks, context-sensitive evaluation criteria, and strategic integration of ESG. Limitations are acknowledged, particularly the reliance on secondary data, while directions for future research include empirical case studies and longitudinal analysis of ESG adoption in developing contexts. The research concludes that ESG is not a universal framework but a context-dependent discourse, with both convergences and divergences shaping its global trajectory.
Reference Key
imported_1778213140_69fd611441d0e Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Zonaira Akbar
Journal Digital & Social Review
Year 2025
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.