Evaluation of Active Queue Management Methods based on Integrated AHP, TOPSIS and Fuzzy TOPSIS

Clicks: 3
ID: 313281
2022
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #579 of 705 articles by views in Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 705 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The Evaluation and selection of Active Queue Management (AQM) methods are a complicated and challenging task. Improper AQM method can cause up-mark and network malfunctioning. To achieve satisfactory performance, various evaluation criteria need to be considered. In order to find the limitations of how the criteria are determined, there is a need to find out how their procedures change according to the evaluation and benchmarking process of AQM. This article focuses on the evaluation and benchmarking of Active Queue Management methods using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques. MCDM uses different techniques to figure out the best alternative from multi-criteria and multi alternative conditions. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a multi-criteria decision-making technique that is used to assign weights to criteria. Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is used for ranking and selection of different alternatives by using distance measures. Whereas, FUZZY TOPSIS is used for criteria weightage and alternatives rating. MCDM calculation is performed on AQM methods and it is tried to discuss all these techniques. MCDM uses performance, overhead, and configuration criteria to evaluate and select the best AQM method that helps to determine solutions for future directions. The results show that Random Early Detection (RED) method got higher ranking score records as compared to other AQM methods.
Reference Key
imported_1777060233_69ebc98924d8d Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Gra Badshah
Journal Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics
Year 2022
DOI
10.56979/301/2022/39
URL
https://jcbi.org/index.php/Main/article/view/39
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.