Prohibitory Sign Detection Using Machine Learning
Clicks: 1
ID: 313148
2023
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #615 of 705 articles by views in Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 705 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
With advancement, technology is becoming increasingly creative in every field. It is atomized using machine learning and artificial intelligence approaches. The detection of traffic signs is a core technology used in automated vehicles. Real-world applications of traffic sign recognition include self-driving, traffic monitoring systems, and safe driving. Very limited work has been done on the Pakistani traffic signs after finding a huge gap and knowing the importance of growing technology and demand. In the results, we first created a dataset since Pakistan lacked a dataset of this kind, and then we used algorithms for machine learning to produce the desired outcomes. To process the gathered images and recognize traffic signs, we employed a variety of deep learning algorithms, including CNNs (convolutional neural networks) and SVMs (support vector machines). We have used YoloV4 and Darknet53 with pre-trained weights of conv.137 for detection purposes, and we have used Google's GPU for training due to limited resources. We got an accuracy of 83 on the new dataset (mAP=83). Although the accuracy of 83 was promising, it was challenging to keep this rate with our limited resources, as we had to terminate the training process after three weeks on Google's GPU after 16,600 iterations and at 83 Mean Average Precision. Then, I took a few real-world images of different classes to check the performance of the training model. The results show the images with boundary boxes and predicted class categories.
| Reference Key |
imported_1777059414_69ebc656baddc
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Anees Tariq |
| Journal | Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics |
| Year | 2023 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.