The Sentence Level Sentiment Analysis of Cyber Trolling Tweets Using Machine Learning Technique
Clicks: 1
ID: 313100
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #529 of 705 articles by views in Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 705 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
People are utilizing the networking site Twitter not only for social interaction but also to express their opinions, thoughts, news, and personal information in the form of text, videos, and pictures. Many of these tweets are cyber-trolling-related, psychologically devastating, and should be on the notice of the police. However, analyzing these tweets manually is quite difficult. Therefore, an intelligent mechanism is required to examine and polarize those cyber trolling-related tweets. Thus, in this paper, Valence Aware Dictionary Sentence (VADsentence) Miner has been proposed to perform Sentence Level Sentiment Analysis (SLSA) using machine learning (ML) techniques. For this purpose, tweets are pre-processed and sentences are extracted on the base of adjectives, adverbs and noun phrases. For SLSA, a combination of lexicon and rule-based approach named Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner (VADER) is used to compute the sentiment polarity of tweets based on sentences. The proposed VADsentence Mines experimented with the feature selection technique TF-IDF and machine learning algorithms. Results of VADsentence Miner are compared with TextBlob in that VADsentence Miner outperformed 90% in accuracy, 82% in precision, 74% in recall, and 78% in F1-score on the Random Forest machine learning classifier and Term Frequency Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF). Textblob however, could archive 67% of accuracy on Random Forest and Term Frequency Inverse document frequency (TF-IDF).
| Reference Key |
imported_1777059029_69ebc4d597709
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Muhammad Ikram |
| Journal | Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics |
| Year | 2024 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.