Author Identification Using Machine Learning

Clicks: 3
ID: 313069
2024
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #379 of 705 articles by views in Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 705 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Identifying the writers of a piece of writing, whether anonymous or not, is a procedure that focuses solely on the writing style and not on the content itself. Most of the time, writing and speaking style may also be seen as techniques of underlying sentence construction, which can be evaluated using aspects such as vocabulary, length of sentences, and sequence of words, richness, and word frequency usage. The primary goal of this article is to examine and apply a variety of categorization approaches to research articles that analyze author identity and the content of those texts that are in dispute. Researchers' earlier work is also discussed and elaborated upon. After that, we were able to exhibit better findings from our experiments. With feature spaces, the SVM technique is particularly well-suited to the aforementioned problem. Across all experiments, it was found that the SVM was effective at determining the authorship of research publications. SVM was used to classify two sets of data in that study. Sections A and B of the experiment are referred to as Experiment A and B, respectively. 500 research papers from conferences and the majority of them from Google Scholar are included in Experiment A. After applying data mining techniques to the gathered dataset, we have a final set of 400 research papers. A, B, and C are the three subsets of the 400 research papers for high performance that were further subdivided. Our model was able to train quickly and evaluate good performance on these limited research criteria in these datasets as a result of an increase in both the number of authors and the number of publications that were included in the dataset.
Reference Key
imported_1777058812_69ebc3fce60a6 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Muhammad Ahsan Jamil
Journal Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics
Year 2024
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://jcbi.org/index.php/Main/article/view/366
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.