Unveiling Soil Fertility Patterns via Image Analysis and Machine Learning for Accurate Crop Recommendations

Clicks: 1
ID: 313029
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #566 of 705 articles by views in Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 705 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Accurate fertilizer use is essential for precision agriculture. Crop recommendation systems should consider real-time data on soil fertility, crop type, soil nutrients, and environment to ensure sustainability and profitability. Due to its intricacy, real-time fertility of soil mapping is expensive, time-consuming, and costly. Using the Image's real-time soil fertility mapping data, we offer a crop selection approach based on artificial intelligence. It is suggested that an image architecture aid soil fertilizer mapping. Real agricultural fields have been employed to assess the precision of IMAGE-based fertility mapping employing the provided method. When evaluating IMAGE base fertility mapping compared to the process of soil chemical analysis, we look at its ability to accurately track nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and other environmental variables including humidity, precipitation, temperatures, and pH. Based on the soil fertilizer information, the following machine learning techniques are used to suggest crops: Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), and XGBoost (XGB). All machine learning algorithm performance is well good but the GNB and RF is performed most accurate performance as compared to other machine learning modules.
Reference Key
imported_1777058552_69ebc2f82d67a Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Marwa Mahmood
Journal Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics
Year 2024
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.