Diagnostic Prediction based on Medical Notes using Machine Learning

Clicks: 3
ID: 313009
2024
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #124 of 705 articles by views in Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 705 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Clinical experts have extracted clinically relevant information from clinical notes through manual review, which has had scaling and financial issues. This is particularly relevant for different diseases since clinical notes prevail over structured data. The availability of this data gives a wonderful opportunity for natural language processing (NLP) to automatically extract clinically relevant information that might delay or prevent the onset of disease, but it also poses several challenges. In this work, we sought to investigate the current state of the art and suggest possible future research pathways that might expedite the general use of natural language processing in disease-related clinical notes. In this study, Kaggle, an open-source platform for machine learning challenges, provides the dataset. The patient's age, gender, diagnoses, and other vitals are all included in the dataset's text format. The dataset collection contains information from many categories. Each stage plays an important role in predicting patient therapy based on clinical notes, from dataset preparation through model training and testing. Two feature engineering methods, term frequency-inverse document frequency and bag of words are used for feature extraction. Six distinct machine learning (ML) methods, Naive Bayes, Light GBM, Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Extra Tree Classifiers were employed for analysis. Various sample sizes of the dataset have been used in the proposed study. Based on the findings, logistic regression is the most effective algorithm for predicting medical therapy, with an accuracy of 85.94%.
Reference Key
imported_1777058428_69ebc27c532b3 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors M. Abdul Qadoos Bilal
Journal Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics
Year 2024
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://jcbi.org/index.php/Main/article/view/337
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.