Exploring Phishing Attacks in the AI Age: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Clicks: 1
ID: 313004
2024
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #481 of 705 articles by views in Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 705 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Over the years, phishing attacks have also evolved to more difficult types of phishing such as spear-phishing and clone-phishing. By nature, these attacks target not only human but also technical vulnerability resulting in massive financial losses and data exposure. So the more complex these methods become – such as phishing, cyberbullying or Packet Sniffing — offers in need new cybersecurity protocols to get rid of those threats. We have done this study by using Kitchenham Systematic Literature Review (SLR) framework, which consists of three phases: planning; conducting and reporting. These programs were reviewed because of the increased use in AI oriented operations such as financial phishing attacks, with new difficulties for detection systems. Furthermore, the study undertook extensive database searches on computers routines like IEEE Access, ResearchGate and Google Scholar rich in recent scientific studies. Methods: A two-phase screening process rigorously identified 20 high quality articles out of an initial pool of 250 studies for further analysis. The results are a good demonstration that AI-driven phishing campaigns continue to evolve in complexity, and in many cases can be more difficult to spot. Moreover, the current AI-based detection systems are mainly not claimed fully secured as they can easily tricked through adversarial attacks which may needs to updated or refine time after one another. The research indicates that combining contextual and behavioral investigation may improve the ability to detect threats as they take place. In addition, it is advisable to deploy a multi-layered security approach that combines traditional AI methodologies with human oversight through machine learning for more effective threat detection and prevention. The research highlights the need for preventative security strategies and continued detection innovations against ever more sophisticated phishing campaigns.
Reference Key
imported_1777058391_69ebc25757726 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Zeeshan Mubeen
Journal Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics
Year 2024
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://jcbi.org/index.php/Main/article/view/567
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.