Evaluating Rainfall Prediction Models on Time Series Data from Bangladesh and Pakistan: A Comparative Approach

Clicks: 3
ID: 312962
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #213 of 705 articles by views in Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 705 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Predicting rainfall is obviously a challenging task due to the multitude of factors and elements that impact climate conditions. Accurate rainfall forecasts are extremely important, especially for the agriculture industry, which depends heavily on timely and adequate rainfall for crop growth and result. The need for precise rainfall forecasts is further highlighted by the economic contribution that agriculture makes. Around the world, a variety of techniques have been employed to forecast rainfall patterns. This paper presents a comparative analysis of various rainfall prediction models, including statistical, machine learning on time series data and statistical approaches. We evaluate the performance of ARIMA, Random Forest, Linear Regression, Gradient Boosting and SVM models on diverse datasets from different geographical regions and climatic conditions. This study evaluates rainfall prediction using both machine learning and statistical model on distinct datasets from Bangladesh and Pakistan. The ARIMA (3, 2, and 1) model is applied to both datasets, demonstrating consistent performance on the Pakistan dataset with minimal differences between in-sample and out-of-sample results, indicating reliable forecasting ability. In contrast, the Bangladesh dataset shows a noticeable drop in performance from in-sample to out-of-sample, suggesting potential over fitting. Additionally, machine learning models such as Gradient Boosting (GB), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Regressor (SVR), and Linear Regression (LR) are utilized. For the Bangladesh dataset, Gradient Boosting outperformed others with the lowest error values (MSE: 6435.975, RMSE: 80.225, MAE: 51.064) and the highest R² score (0.842). On the Pakistan dataset, Linear Regression produced the best results with the lowest MSE (270.138), RMSE (16.436), and MAE (11.572).Our findings highlight the strengths and limitations of each model, offering insights into their applicability for accurate rainfall forecasting.
Reference Key
imported_1777058083_69ebc1231036e Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Alisha Farman
Journal Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics
Year 2024
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.