Enhancing Mobile App Quality: A Data-Driven Approach to User Feedback

Clicks: 14
ID: 312784
2025
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #659 of 705 articles by views in Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 705 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In the very competitive mobile application arena, customer reviews are essential for success. Timely responses to these reviews can substantially enhance an app’s rating and prominence. The proliferation of user-generated content has rendered the extraction of useful insights increasingly challenging for developers. To enhance user experience and enable prompt changes, it is essential to swiftly and properly identify the primary issues encountered by users. This research presents a dual-phase hybrid framework. Phase 1 computes the mean sentiment rating for user reviews of Zoom Cloud Meeting, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet. According to these averages, Phase 2 offers pragmatic recommendations to developers. A text data augmentation strategy utilizing the advanced language comprehension capabilities of big language models such as ChatGPT was implemented. The framework uses a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) to calculate ratings from review datasets and BERT-base for labeling and analyzing feelings. The suggested hybrid model exhibited robust performance on datasets containing a substantial number of reviews, suggesting a tendency for positive ratings to surpass negative ones. The study utilized a benchmark dataset comprising 44,767 app reviews to compare its findings with actual ratings, yielding significant insights for enhancing app development. According to average evaluations, Microsoft Teams (4.52) and Zoom Cloud Meeting (4.16) outperformed Google Meet (3.12) and all other applications (3.40), indicating that users of Teams and Zoom will derive the most advantages from the latest versions. We anticipate that the study’s recommendations will aid app makers in enhancing their offerings.
Reference Key
imported_1777056811_69ebbc2be8367 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics
Year 2025
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.