Comparative Analysis of LSTM-Based Variant Models for Detecting Attacks in IoT Networks
Clicks: 1
ID: 312685
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #109 of 705 articles by views in Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 705 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) networks have established unparalleled connection possibilities and convenient features and have set new challenges associated with dubious security barriers and potential attacks. This study evaluates attack detection performance of LSTM-Based Variant models namely LSTM, DeepBiLSTM and BLSTM recurrent neural networks by bringing up experiment analysis of the IoT networks. We evaluate the three models using benchmark IoT dataset in terms of detection accuracy, precision, recall and F1 measure. The experiment results indicate that the three LSTM-based models, LSTM, BiLSTM, and DeepBiLSTM, demonstrate a high level of performance, regardless of the batch size (32, 64, 128, 256, and 512). DeepBiLSTM has a little better overall performance, which validates its soundness and suitability towards scale in detecting attacks in large IoT networks.
| Reference Key |
imported_1777056025_69ebb9194d155
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Shahid Mehmood |
| Journal | Journal of Computing & Biomedical Informatics |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.56979/1001/2025/1169
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.