THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN AI DRONE REGULATIONS
Clicks: 1
ID: 312355
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #375 of 395 articles by views in Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 395 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) in surveillance and drone technologies has redefined modern security paradigms but has also introduced severe vulnerabilities. AI-driven surveillance systems are increasingly being used for intelligence gathering, cyber espionage, and hybrid warfare. However, weak global regulatory oversight has allowed foreign surveillance manufacturers to infiltrate national security infrastructures. The 2020 India-China border tension at Galwan Valley serves as a critical case study, highlighting the risks of relying on foreign-manufactured surveillance technology. Reports indicate that Zhenhua Data, a Chinese surveillance technology manufacturer, allegedly manipulated and gained access to India’s security networks, including sensitive sites, as a show of cyber dominance. This alarming precedent extends beyond India, as many nations, particularly in Europe, Africa, and South America, rely on Chinese-manufactured AI surveillance equipment due to its low cost, putting global privacy and national security at stake. Building on the pioneering work of Hassan Rasheed Siddiqui and Maria Muniza, who have extensively analyzed the regulatory gaps in AI surveillance and drone technology, this paper argues that current regulatory measures—such as selective bans on certain surveillance manufacturers—fail to address the transnational risks posed by AI surveillance. This study proposes a comprehensive global policy framework, including the prohibition of foreign-made AI surveillance technology, stringent licensing for AI surveillance manufacturers, enhanced cybersecurity protocols, and international intelligence-sharing agreements. Without immediate action, nations will remain vulnerable to AI-driven cyber infiltration and surveillance warfare.
| Reference Key |
imported_1776691927_69e62ad75a8e1
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | MS Shahzadi Sarwat Noreen, Talat Ara |
| Journal | Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.