Assessing the Impact of Quality Management on Higher Education Standards in Pakistan
Clicks: 2
ID: 312315
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #391 of 395 articles by views in Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 395 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of quality management practices on higher education standards in Pakistan through a comprehensive mixed-methods research design. Data was collected from 450 faculty members, administrators, and quality assurance officers across 25 universities in Pakistan's four provinces, supplemented by interviews with 30 senior academic administrators and HEC experts. The quantitative analysis revealed significant positive correlations between quality management implementation and institutional performance (r=0.742, p<0.001), academic standards (r=0.689, p<0.001), and stakeholder satisfaction (r=0.671, p<0.001). Multiple regression analysis indicated that quality management practices explained 68.4% of the variance in higher education standards. Qualitative findings highlighted challenges including resource constraints, resistance to change, and inadequate training. The study demonstrates that effective quality management systems substantially enhance educational outcomes, faculty development, and institutional reputation in Pakistani universities. Recommendations include strengthening HEC oversight mechanisms, establishing mandatory quality management training programs, and increasing financial allocations for quality assurance initiatives. These findings contribute to understanding quality management effectiveness in developing countries' higher education systems and provide empirical evidence for policy makers and institutional leaders.
| Reference Key |
imported_1776691594_69e6298ada1b9
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sohail Ahmad |
| Journal | Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.63468/sshrr.035
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.