Economic Challenges In Pakistan: A Comparative Analysis of Political Regimes and Policy Implications

Clicks: 1
ID: 312199
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #295 of 395 articles by views in Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 395 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Pakistan's economy has faced continuous challenges due to political instability, governance failures and external shocks. This study does a comparative analysis of economic performance under various political rule (PTI: 2018–2022; PDM: 2022-present; and historical PML-N/PPP governments) to identify systemic weaknesses and policy effects. Using mixed-method research (quantitative economy and qualitative governance analysis), we test five hypotheses: H₀ (PTI responsibility), h₁ (PDM accountability), h3 (external factor), h4 (structural governance failures), and h₅ (political instability). Results suggest that Stark contradiction: PTI received an current account surplus ($ 959m in 2021), record remittance ($ 32B), and GDP growth (5.8% in 2022), while inflation in PDM's tenure saw an increase of 43%, which increases $ 7B (2023), and industrial contraception. The regression analysis confirms the quality of governance (β = 0.81, p <0.001) and political instability (Granger causes: p <0.05) as primary drivers of the crisis. 2022 floods ($ 45B loss) and Covid-19 increased the decline, but deepening the upheaval by policy discrepancies (eg, IMF under PDM). Major findings include: coalition governments (PDMs) by reducing single-party regime (PTI) due to conflicting policies. Corruption (Transparency International Score: 140/180) and debt accumulation ($ $ 92B) are structural obstacles. Public mistrust in PDM (64% rejection, Galp 2022) is correlated with economic decline. We recommend: to ensure institutional reforms to curb corruption and continuity of policy, energy field overhaul to address $ 247m annual deficit, and a cross-party economic charter to stabilize the regime. This study underlines that Pakistan's crisis has arisen for decades of rule, worsened by recent regime incompetence, necessitating systemic, not partisan, solutions
Reference Key
imported_1776683148_69e6088cf3414 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Al-Harath Ateik
Journal Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review
Year 2025
DOI
10.63468/sshrr.047
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.