LEGAL STRUCTURES, STRATEGIC VOTING: ANALYZING THE INFLUENCE OF ELECTORAL LAWS ON POLITICAL ENGAGEMENT
Clicks: 1
ID: 312196
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #259 of 395 articles by views in Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 395 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study examines the impact of electoral laws on voter behavior and political party strategies across diverse democratic contexts. Drawing on theoretical frameworks and empirical insights, it explores how institutional features such as electoral systems, legal thresholds, district magnitude, and voter registration rules influence turnout, strategic versus sincere voting, and party adaptation. Through a comparative analysis of four countries—the United States, Germany, India, and Pakistan—the research reveals that proportional systems foster higher participation and more genuine vote expression, while majoritarian systems often suppress voter efficacy and promote strategic coordination. Furthermore, political parties respond to legal constraints by altering their candidate selection, coalition-building, and campaign messaging strategies in ways that reflect the incentives of each system. The findings highlight the critical role of electoral design in shaping the quality of democratic representation and participation. Policy recommendations include adopting mixed or proportional electoral components, reducing barriers to participation, and enhancing institutional enforcement to promote inclusive governance. The study concludes that well-calibrated electoral reforms can improve voter trust, pluralism, and democratic resilience.
| Reference Key |
imported_1776683095_69e60857b3158
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Dr. Ghulam Shabbir |
| Journal | Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.63468/sshrr.024
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.