The Study How the Collaborative Learning Improve Student’s Achievement at Higher Level
Clicks: 1
ID: 312180
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #235 of 395 articles by views in Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 395 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study demonstrate how collaborative learning approach affect or improve student’s achievement. The study was directed by three objectives and three research questions. Survey studies and mix-method approaches were among them. Examining in-depth papers that emphasize collaborative learning to raise student accomplishment is the goal of this study. The effect of collaborative learning (CL) on critical thinking abilities has been the subject of numerous studies. Later, this study also looked into how students felt about CL. A combination of methods was used. As the samples are chosen participants for a quantitative inquiry, 225 students 101 male and 124 females from an education department at a university were included. The quantitative data were analyzed using independent sample t-test, mean, stander deviation, degree of freedom, t value, two tailed p value and the qualitative data were analyzed using an interactive model of analysis. The results showed that CL significantly and favorably affected students' academic performance. The students believed that CL improved their emotional intelligence, motivation to learn, cognitive growth, and open-mindedness. However, the most popular tools for gathering and analyzing research data were the t-test, ANOVA and ANCOVA. In light of the study's findings, a number of suggestions have been made for further research, chief among them the necessity of broadening the range of study designs that emphasize critical and creative thinking abilities. Qualitative studies on the growth of critical and creative thinking abilities must be conducted more frequently. Researchers are advised to select a more suitable data analysis method.
| Reference Key |
imported_1776682726_69e606e6d9ad2
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Zoya Khakwani |
| Journal | Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.63468/sshrr.194
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.