Nature and Environmental Ethics in Indigenous Literature: A Study of Linda Hogan's Power and Sherman Alexie's The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven
Clicks: 2
ID: 312159
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #183 of 395 articles by views in Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 395 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper analyzes how nature and environmental ethics are represented in contemporary Indigenous American literature, focusing on Power by Linda Hogan (1998) and The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven by Sherman Alexie (1993). Using ecocritical theory and postcolonial environmental discourse, the study explores Indigenous ecological worldviews and how they challenge dominant Western paradigms. By examining the intersection of cultural persistence, environmental stewardship, and spiritual connection to land, this paper provides a close reading through Lawrence Buell’s ecocritical model. The analysis argues that both authors use narrative techniques to equate ecological damage with cultural erasure, and to propose that ecological renewal and cultural survival are inseparable. Hogan presents nature as a sacred text requiring ceremonial understanding, while Alexie depicts environmental loss as ongoing trauma that fragments identity. The findings show that Indigenous environmental ethics, as portrayed by these authors, offer essential alternative approaches to ecological crisis. This study contributes to ecocritical discourse by foregrounding Indigenous perspectives and highlighting the importance of incorporating Indigenous ecological knowledge in environmental humanities research.
| Reference Key |
imported_1776682550_69e606362cb17
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Dr. Gul Zamin Khan |
| Journal | Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.63468/sshrr.173
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.