The Dynamics of International Relations in Shaping Global Political Order: A Comparative Analytical Perspective
Clicks: 1
ID: 312120
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #296 of 395 articles by views in Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 395 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background: The developments of international relations have significantly affected the form of the global political order, in particular, in the framework of the increasing multipolarity, ideological confrontation and global challenges. The fact that emergent powers like China, India and Brazil are challenging hegemonic structures in an expanded way means that there is need to reconsider the world governance models.
Aim: The purpose of the case study is to discuss how the various forms of state behavior, institutional interactions, and normative standings influence the global politics order through a comparative analysis approach.
Method: A qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was followed that involved four strategic case studies: United States China rivalry, the European Union integration, Russian assertive behavior in foreign policies and the collaboration of the BRICS coalition of nations. The information was retrieved based on peer-reviewed scholarly articles, governmental and establishment reports published in 2021- 2025.
Results: Outcomes show that there are considerable differences in military capability, institutional compliance, strategic behaviors and responses to the crises in the world. Although the Western actors remain the most dominant in terms of soft power and external institutional activity, the emergence of new powers is changing the international order, based on the promotion of alternative models of governance and regionalization of power.
Conclusion: Transnational issues like pandemics and global warming have provided evidence of the inadequacies of extant governance systems and indicated the significance of adapting, collaborative and pluralistic international strategies. The author of the study comes to a conclusion that the international order is not too unipolar and not strictly hierarchical any more but is fluent, contested, and with numerous complicated relations between various actors.
| Reference Key |
imported_1776681359_69e6018fda1cd
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Kashif Khan |
| Journal | Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.