Digital Trade and Cyber-Facilitated Human Trafficking: Legal Challenges and Regulatory Gaps in Pakistan
Clicks: 1
ID: 311999
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #178 of 395 articles by views in Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 395 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The merging of digital trade platforms and organised crime networks has created a new and relatively unregulated aspect of human trafficking, which is ever more committed by means of cyber-enabled platforms such as social media, online job portals, encrypted messaging apps, and cryptocurrency-based payment networks. The paper examines the issues of legal and regulatory voids that Pakistan faces in combating cyber-enabled human trafficking, a phenomenon that is theorised in the paper as the Cyber-Trafficking Nexus a systemic interaction of digital commerce ecosystems and contemporary slavery networks. Based on the methodology of a critical assessment of the sufficiency of the main legal tools, the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act 2016 (PECA) and the Prevention of Trafficking in Persons Act 2018 (PTPA) along with provincial anti-trafficking laws, the study compares the effectiveness of these instruments in dealing with technologically mediated trafficking offences in Pakistan. The discussion shows that PECA 2016 is inadequately structured: it was not created with typologies of trafficking in mind, does not have a means of proactively surveilling trafficking networks digitally, and does not deal with cryptocurrency-mediated money flows; the PTPA 2018, in turn, precedes the widespread popularization of social-media recruitment and lacks any cyber-specific definition. According to the statistical data presented by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) and foreign monitoring groups, there is systematic under-prosecution, insufficient victim identification and a lack of cross-sector digital collaboration. By comparing the Digital Services Act by the European Union, the Modern Slavery Act 2015 of the United Kingdom, and the relevant United Nations frameworks such as the Palermo Protocol and the UNODC Model Law, this article suggests a tripartite Legal Reform Model to be adopted in Pakistan that includes the legislation integration, the regulation technology requirements, and the international forms of digital collaboration. This paper concludes that Pakistan legislative architecture, unless it is added to by a specific Cyber-Trafficking Act, will be structurally unable to face this twenty-first century incarnation of human exploitation.
| Reference Key |
imported_1776673044_69e5e114a6567
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Dr. Ahmad Saad |
| Journal | Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.63468/sshrr.371
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.