Digital Therapeutics and Tele-psychology: Efficacy and Ethical Considerations in Remote Counseling for Depression and Anxiety in the Post-Pandemic Era
Clicks: 1
ID: 311997
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #147 of 395 articles by views in Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 395 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background: With the growth of digital therapeutics and tele-psychology in the post-pandemic era, the provision of mental health services, specifically depression and anxiety, has changed greatly. Despite the benefits of remote counseling in accessibility and continuity of care, there exist concerns that could be related to the relative effectiveness and ethical practice as data privacy, equity and crisis management.
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to identify the efficacy and ethical factors of online therapeutics and tele-psychology in remote depression and anxiety counseling among adults.
Procedure: The research design used was a quantitative explanatory design. The information gathered regarding 300 adults who were provided with remote psychological interventions. The severity of the symptoms before and after the intervention were measured with standardized tools, such as the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7). The SPSS version 27 was used to analyze the data through descriptive statistics, paired sample t-tests, subgroup analysis, and calculation of effect size (Cohen d). Other areas of ethics like informed consent, privacy of the data, crisis management and accessibility were checked.
Findings: The scores in depression and anxiety reduced significantly due to intervention (p < .001) and the effect sizes of synchronous tele-psychology were large. Digital interventions guided by a professional were more adherent and had less symptom reduction than unguided programs. The compliance with ethics was high regarding informed consent and data security and mid-range regarding access and AI transparency.
Conclusion: Digital therapeutics and tele-psychology are effective and scalable strategies of managing depression and anxiety, but more robust ethical governance and strategies of providing equitable access are required to sustain delivery.
| Reference Key |
imported_1776672994_69e5e0e2de118
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sadiya Asim |
| Journal | Social Sciences & Humanity Research Review |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.