Perbandingan Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw dan Tipe STAD Terhadap Kemampuan Numerik Siswa Kelas VII di SMPN 14 Pekanbaru: Comparison of Jigsaw Type and STAD Type Cooperative Learning Models on Numerical Ability of Seventh Grade Students at SMPN 14 Pekanbaru
Clicks: 4
ID: 311855
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
0.9
/100
4 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #20 of 39 articles by views in Journal of Research in Science and Mathematics Education
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Purpose: This research aims to compare the Jigsaw type and STAD type cooperative learning models in terms of their impact on the numerical abilities of seventh-grade students at SMPN 14 Pekanbaru. Methodology: The study follows a quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group. The population included all seventh-grade students at SMPN 14 Pekanbaru for the 2023/2024 academic year, totaling 199 students. The research sample consisted of Class VII.1 as experimental group 1, using the STAD type, and Class VII.5 as experimental group 2, using the Jigsaw type. The data collection instrument employed was a test technique, and data analysis involved descriptive statistical analysis and posttest inferential statistical analysis. Findings: The results of the Mann-Whitney U test revealed that the average posttest score for the STAD class was 32.48, whereas for the Jigsaw class, it was 21.31. Consequently, the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected, and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted. Significance: This indicates a significant difference in numerical ability between students taught using the Jigsaw type and those taught using the STAD type cooperative learning model. Specifically, the STAD type was found to be more effective than the Jigsaw type in enhancing students' numerical abilities.
| Reference Key |
imported_1772724047_69a99f4f3bf6d
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sindi Amelia |
| Journal | Journal of Research in Science and Mathematics Education |
| Year | 2024 |
| DOI |
10.56855/jrsme.v3i1.903
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.