Intervention in Students’ Performance in Basic Science and Technology Using Blended Learning Strategies
Clicks: 1
ID: 311841
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
0 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated the efficacy of two blended learning approaches—Face-to-Face Learning (FFL) and the Online Laboratory Strategy (OLS)—in improving the academic performance of Basic Eight students in Basic Science and Technology in Benue State, Nigeria. Methodology: Employing a quasi-experimental design, the research sampled 210 students from a target population of 27,457 across six secondary schools. Data were collected using the Basic Science and Technology Performance Test (BSTPT), which demonstrated strong internal consistency with a reliability coefficient of 0.88. Findings: Analysis of variance revealed a statistically significant difference in the mean performance scores of students exposed to FFL and OLS compared to those taught using traditional demonstration methods, F(2, 206) = 131.395, p < 0.001. However, no statistically significant gender differences were observed in performance under either FFL (F(1, 71) = 1.685, p = 0.198) or OLS (F(1, 68) = 0.048, p = 0.828), suggesting that the effectiveness of both strategies was independent of gender. These findings underscore the pedagogical value of FFL and OLS in enhancing science learning outcomes. Significance: Consequently, the study recommends that educational policymakers and teacher education institutions adopt and institutionalize these blended learning strategies within curriculum frameworks. Moreover, sustained investment in teacher training and resource provision is essential to maximize the instructional benefits of these approaches and promote equitable, high-quality science education.
| Reference Key |
imported_1772723929_69a99ed9551dc
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter O. Agogo |
| Journal | Journal of Research in Science and Mathematics Education |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.56855/jrsme.v4i1.1222
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.