The Effect of Federalism on Minority Rights Protection
Clicks: 1
ID: 311474
2023
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #27 of 28 articles by views in Social Thought and Policy Review
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study investigates the complex relationship between federalism and the protection of minority rights through a mixed-methods approach that integrates quantitative analysis and qualitative case studies. Drawing on panel data from twenty federated states between 2000 and 2020, the research develops a Minority Rights Protection Index (MRPI) to evaluate the impact of decentralization, fiscal autonomy, and judicial independence on minority outcomes. The quantitative results demonstrate that federalism is positively correlated with improvements in minority political representation, language rights enforcement, and welfare allocation, though significant variation exists depending on the design of institutions and intergovernmental cooperation. Tables further highlight disparities across different dimensions of federal structures, such as fiscal decentralization and judicial protections, while figures reveal trends in education access, welfare distribution, and regional disparities. Complementing this, qualitative findings from case studies of Canada, India, and Ethiopia reveal that while federalism can empower minorities by offering autonomy and cultural recognition, it can also entrench inequalities where local elites exploit decentralization to suppress minority voices. The integrated analysis thus reveals federalism as a dual-edged instrument: in inclusive and democratic settings, it fosters protection and representation, but in fragmented or authoritarian contexts, it can exacerbate exclusion. Overall, the study underscores the importance of institutional safeguards, judicial oversight, and strong civil society in ensuring that federalism fulfills its potential as a mechanism for protecting minority rights.
| Reference Key |
imported_1770593440_69891ca09063e
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Khalid Hussain, Sadia Anwar |
| Journal | Social Thought and Policy Review |
| Year | 2023 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.