The Role of Civil Society in Strengthening Democratic Institutions

Clicks: 1
ID: 311449
2023
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #11 of 25 articles by views in Journal of Social Impact Studies

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study investigates the role of civil society in strengthening democratic institutions through a mixed-methods design that integrates quantitative survey data with qualitative interviews and case studies. The quantitative findings revealed a strong and positive association between civil society engagement and institutional trust, with regression analyses confirming civic participation as a significant predictor of confidence in parliaments, electoral commissions, and judiciaries. Mediation models demonstrated that civic education amplifies this relationship, suggesting that informed and engaged citizens are more likely to hold institutions accountable and reinforce democratic legitimacy. Further, subgroup analysis indicated that women and urban populations benefit more from civil society engagement, reporting higher levels of institutional trust than men and rural residents. Qualitative findings supported these results, with respondents highlighting the importance of civil society organizations as watchdogs, mediators, and advocates for transparency, accountability, and inclusivity. Case narratives underscored that civic networks foster resistance against democratic erosion, especially in contexts of political repression or weak governance structures. Figures and tables consistently illustrated these patterns, including regression outcomes, subgroup variations, and hybrid visualizations integrating quantitative and qualitative insights. Collectively, the results demonstrate that civil society is not merely an accessory to democracy but an indispensable driver of institutional resilience and legitimacy. However, the findings also caution that legal restrictions, resource constraints, and digital surveillance continue to limit civil society’s potential. The study concludes that enabling environments, stronger protections for civic freedoms, and integration of civic education into governance frameworks are essential to maximize civil society’s contributions to democratic strengthening.
Reference Key
imported_1770592120_698917784eaef Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kamran Siddiqui
Journal Journal of Social Impact Studies
Year 2023
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.