The Effect of Communication Strategies on Crisis Management
Clicks: 1
ID: 311443
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #17 of 25 articles by views in Journal of Social Impact Studies
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of communication strategies on the effectiveness of crisis management across organizational and industry contexts. Employing a mixed-methods experimental design, data were collected from 400 survey respondents, semi-structured interviews, and controlled simulation experiments where participants were exposed to crisis messages framed with varying strategies, including timeliness, transparency, empathy, and consistency. Quantitative analysis was conducted through regression and ANOVA models, while qualitative data were examined using thematic coding and discourse analysis. A Crisis Communication Effectiveness Index (CCEI) was developed to standardize performance measurement across cases.
Results from nine statistical tables indicated that timely communication was strongly associated with higher stakeholder trust, while transparency and empathy significantly enhanced credibility and compliance. Consistency in messaging reduced confusion and reinforced long-term confidence, with proactive strategies outperforming reactive responses. Findings from twelve figures further illustrated these dynamics, demonstrating that digital responsiveness through social media reduced misinformation, accelerated crisis containment, and improved stakeholder engagement. Cross-industry comparisons revealed heightened expectations for transparency in healthcare and aviation, while corporate and governmental contexts emphasized empathy and consistency.
The discussion situates these findings within theoretical frameworks such as Situational Crisis Communication Theory and Stakeholder Theory, affirming that strategic communication is not ancillary but fundamental to effective crisis response. The study concludes that multidimensional communication strategies—balancing timeliness, openness, emotional intelligence, and coherence—are essential for sustaining legitimacy and resilience during crises. Practical implications highlight the need for organizations to integrate communication planning into core crisis management frameworks, invest in digital literacy and responsiveness, and tailor strategies to industry-specific expectations.
| Reference Key |
imported_1770592070_69891746a8afe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Shumaila Naveed, Farrukh Jalal |
| Journal | Journal of Social Impact Studies |
| Year | 2024 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.