Media Ownership and Its Impact on Content Diversity

Clicks: 2
ID: 311439
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #16 of 25 articles by views in Journal of Social Impact Studies

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study examines how media ownership structures shape content diversity in platformized news ecosystems by combining quantitative quasi-experiments with qualitative process tracing across a multi-country sample. We link ownership registries and cross-media holdings to outlet catalogs, topic and viewpoint annotations, audience exposure panels, and platform discoverability indicators. Diversity is assessed at three levels—source (owners/outlets), content (topics/viewpoints), and exposure (audiences’ actually encountered mix)—using concentration (HHI), dispersion (Shannon entropy), network centrality of owners, and event-style difference-in-differences around consolidation episodes. Econometric models indicate a negative, statistically robust association between ownership concentration and outlet-level content diversity, net of platform and market covariates; mediation analyses suggest part of this effect operates through changes in algorithmic prominence and discoverability. Public service and independent outlets exhibit higher content and viewpoint diversity than conglomerates, while platform-owned properties enjoy visibility advantages that do not automatically yield diverse exposure without deliberate prominence safeguards. Time-series evidence around a post-2021 consolidation wave shows measurable declines in exposure diversity in several markets, and ownership networks reveal a small cluster of highly central firms with outsized agenda-setting capacity. Qualitative interviews and document analysis corroborate mechanisms of internal editorial alignment and distributional gatekeeping. The study recommends coupling merger review and transparency rules with exposure-oriented remedies—discoverability obligations for general-interest and local content, auditable ranking systems, and internal pluralism safeguards—while noting limitations related to modeled measures and simplified event definitions. Overall, protecting pluralism today requires governance of not only who owns media and what is produced, but how audiences find it.
Reference Key
imported_1770592037_69891725cc36f Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Nadia Hanif, Omer Sheikh
Journal Journal of Social Impact Studies
Year 2024
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.