The Role of International Financial Institutions in Crisis Management

Clicks: 1
ID: 311400
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #25 of 27 articles by views in Finance and Management Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study investigates the role of international financial institutions (IFIs) in crisis management, with a particular focus on the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, and regional development banks. Employing a mixed-method approach that integrates econometric analysis of a panel dataset of 60 crisis-affected countries from 2000 to 2023 with qualitative evaluations of policy documents and stakeholder interviews, the research provides a comprehensive assessment of IFI interventions. The results demonstrate that IFIs play a stabilizing role by providing liquidity, restoring market confidence, and catalyzing private capital inflows. GDP growth trajectories, sovereign bond spreads, and inflation outcomes all suggest that countries engaged in IFI programs recover more quickly than those without such support.However, the findings also reveal important trade-offs. Debt sustainability remains fragile in many cases, as larger loan packages often correlate with rising debt-to-GDP ratios. Social spending frequently declines under fiscal conditionality, with adverse consequences for health and education systems. Stakeholder surveys and interviews further underscore legitimacy concerns, as IFIs are perceived simultaneously as stabilizers and as external actors imposing austerity. The study also finds that new institutions such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) are emerging as competitors, though on a smaller scale, while IFIs adapt their mandates to include climate and resilience considerations.The analysis concludes that IFIs remain indispensable in global financial governance but must evolve to remain effective and legitimate. Reforms that promote socially sensitive conditionalities, enhance coordination with regional safety nets, and embrace broader developmental mandates will be essential for ensuring that IFIs contribute not only to economic stabilization but also to sustainable and inclusive recovery.
Reference Key
imported_1770589232_69890c30c0dac Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Amjad Saqib, Khalid Zaman
Journal Finance and Management Review
Year 2024
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.