Tax Avoidance Strategies and Their Effect on Corporate Governance Structures

Clicks: 2
ID: 311394
2023
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #25 of 25 articles by views in Economic Trends and Business Review

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between tax avoidance strategies and corporate governance structures through a mixed-methods approach that integrates quantitative and qualitative analyses. Using firm-level data tax avoidance was measured through effective tax rates (ETR) and book–tax differences (BTD), while governance indicators included board independence, audit committee size, ownership concentration, and CEO duality. Regression models revealed a significant negative association between aggressive tax practices and governance strength, indicating that weaker monitoring mechanisms often coexist with higher levels of avoidance. Complementary qualitative interviews confirmed that executives often rationalize tax minimization as a fiduciary duty, while governance experts emphasized its ethical and reputational risks.The results demonstrated that firms with concentrated ownership and CEO duality were more likely to pursue aggressive avoidance, whereas independent boards and larger audit committees moderated such behavior. The analysis further highlighted that profitability can coexist with responsible tax strategies, suggesting that strong governance enables firms to achieve financial success without compromising ethical standards. By integrating agency, institutional, and stakeholder theories, the study underscores that governance not only influences tax outcomes but also shapes corporate legitimacy and long-term sustainability.The findings have important policy and managerial implications. Regulators should strengthen governance codes by embedding tax transparency as a key accountability mechanism, while boards and investors should view responsible taxation as part of sustainable value creation. Overall, the study concludes that corporate governance and tax avoidance are mutually reinforcing domains, where weak governance amplifies opportunistic avoidance and robust governance fosters transparency, accountability, and legitimacy.
Reference Key
imported_1770589144_69890bd81b066 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Muhammad Bilal Munshi, Muhammad Rehan
Journal Economic Trends and Business Review
Year 2023
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.