The Essequibo Conundrum: Conflict Analysis of Venezuela-Guyana Border Dispute

Clicks: 2
ID: 311224
2024
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #14 of 43 articles by views in Journal of Peace and Diplomacy

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The long-standing boundary dispute between Venezuela and Guyana over the Essequibo region comprising 70% of Guyana's territory, is deeply rooted in colonial history and geopolitical interests. The conflict escalated significantly after the 2015 discovery of massive oil and gas reserves off the Essequibo coast, estimated at over 11 billion barrels. This discovery prompted Venezuela to renew its territorial claims, citing historical colonial rights. Conversely, Guyana bases its sovereignty on international legal rulings, such as the 1899 arbitration award, and public opinion surveys that show an overwhelming majority supporting Essequibo's retention. The dispute has led to heightened tensions at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and ongoing international legal proceedings. This research examines the conflict through Johan Galtung's concepts of positive and negative peace, as well as direct and structural violence. It investigates the underlying causes and potential resolutions, including the role of historical grievances, the economic stakes, and political instability. The study explores solutions such as international mediation, joint development agreements, and referendums in the disputed area, while recognizing the obstacles posed by entrenched nationalist sentiments and differing governance approaches. These complexities underscore the challenge of achieving a sustainable resolution to this deeply rooted conflict.
Reference Key
imported_1770373341_6985c0dd27c4d Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Arman Ahmed
Journal Journal of Peace and Diplomacy
Year 2024
DOI
10.59111/JPD.005.02.071
URL
https://journalpd.com/index.php/JPD/article/view/71
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.