Technopolitics of Conflict: Unpacking the Role of Drones in Sudan’s War
Clicks: 66
ID: 311213
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
19.5
/100
66 views
5 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #6 of 43 articles by views in Journal of Peace and Diplomacy
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Over the past twenty years, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), widely known as drones, have become a critical innovation in global security. In Africa, more than 20 countries have adopted UAV technology within the last five years, with notable developments in North Africa, West Africa, and increasingly in the Sahel region, especially amid the ongoing conflict in Sudan. This research examined the deployment of drone technology and its broader impact within Sudan’s conflict from 2023 to 2025. Using a qualitative case study framework and thematic analysis, the study offers a nuanced understanding of how drone operations have reshaped warfare, affected civilian protection, and reconfigured power relations. Primary data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with key informants (n=5), including security experts, a policy analyst, a humanitarian officer, and an academic researcher, complemented by online media coverage and specialized sources. Findings reveal paradoxical outcomes: while drones have enabled tactical disruption, enhanced surveillance, and precision strikes, particularly via loitering munitions and foreign-supplied UAVs, they have also contributed to civilian casualties, eroded trust, and intensified ethical scrutiny. In Sudan, drone technologies are not merely tools of military efficiency but instruments that recalibrate battlefield asymmetries and challenge aerial sovereignty in a fragmented security landscape. The study recommends multi-level reforms, including national oversight protocols, regional ethical frameworks, and international tracking mechanisms to regulate drone transfers, safeguard civilian zones, and build technopolitical literacy within Sudan’s transitional governance.
| Reference Key |
imported_1770373199_6985c04fd1f09
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | SHEM SITEKI |
| Journal | Journal of Peace and Diplomacy |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.59111/JPD.006.002.0177
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.