تفسیرِ قرآن کا ادبی و بیانی منہج اور مدرسہ بیانیہ کا کردار: ایک تنقیدی مطالعہ
Clicks: 2
ID: 311082
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #198 of 259 articles by views in Pakistan Journal of Islamic Research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 259 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The 20th century Egypt witnessed several methodological approaches to the interpretation of the Qur’ān. One of them, namely the bayāniya school of tafsir (i.e., the Qur’ānic exegesis), received its first blow during the life span of Amīn al-Khūlī, a 20th century Egyptian exegete, who contributed to the Qur’ānic sciences from several important respects. His legacy continued by his several competent deciples including Aysha Bint-e Shāti and Muhammad Ahmad Khalf Allah. The main focus of the said school was two folds: 1), the al-tafsir al-mawdui (i.e., the subject-wise method of interpretation) of the Qur’ān must be observed; and 2), since the Qur’ān is revealed in the Arabic language, its linguistic dimension should be exhaustively followed in its interpretation, in particular, in case of disagreement of the exegetes, because it is the sole criterian to settele the disagreement. Thus, the school maintained that only the full command of the Arabic language can guide the exegetes to reach the true and deeper meaning of the Qur’ānic text. This paper sheds light on the methodological approach articulated by the Bayāniyah School in order to distinguish them from the traditional prevailing interpretive approaches in the domain of tafsir. It also examines to what extent the said school has employed the Prophetic traditions as a primary source of the interpretation of the Qur’ān.
| Reference Key |
imported_1769983556_697fce4457e6b
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Jamil Akhtar |
| Journal | Pakistan Journal of Islamic Research |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.