عصر حاضر میں عدالتی خلع کا مسئلہ ، مالکی نقطہ نظر اور آیت کریمہ الَّذی بِیَدِہ عُقْدَۃُ النِکَاحِ سے استدلال: Judicial Khul‘ in Pakistan, Mālikī Fiqh, and a Reappraisal of Qur’ān 2:237
Clicks: 1
ID: 310941
2022
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #127 of 259 articles by views in Pakistan Journal of Islamic Research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 259 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This article argues that the judicial authority to issue khul‘ decrees complies with the principles of the sharī‘ah, although it is issued without the husband’s consent. The judicial exercise of ijtihād in khul‘ is based on an interpretation of the relevant texts from the Qur’ān and ḥadīth and is similar to the position held by the Mālikī school. Detractors from this view often cite verse 237 of Surat al-Baqarah, which states, “the one in whose hand is the marriage contract,” to argue that a husband must approve of a khul‘ before it is executed. This article argues that this verse has multiple interpretations, one of which allows a judge to issue divorce on behalf of the husband. Hence, a court has the full authority to dissolve a marriage. The same opinion has been adopted in the Pakistani khul‘ law. This interpretation addresses a moral dilemma often faced by Pakistani women. Some Ḥanafī ‘ulamā’ have suggested that judicial khul‘ is invalid and that a woman remains married to her initial husband. When she enters a second marriage, this is considered an extramarital relationship. By adopting the Mālikī opinion and considering judicial khul‘ as faskh (annulment), the objection of the Ḥanafī ‘ulamā’ can be rebutted. This approach will free women from the dilemma of worldly guilt and fear of punishment on the Day of Judgement.
| Reference Key |
imported_1769979049_697fbca91553e
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Muhammad Ahmad Munir |
| Journal | Pakistan Journal of Islamic Research |
| Year | 2022 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.