Analysis of the differences in the conflict in Kyiv in international media with some global online press channels
Clicks: 3
ID: 310627
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #165 of 409 articles by views in International Journal of Science and Social Science Research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 409 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study examines the international media coverage of Kyiv's Kursk Offensive, adopting a multidisciplinary approach that combines document analysis, Python-based web scraping, statistical modeling with SPSS, and intercoding validation techniques. Grounded in Vietnam’s perspective on international issues and the principles of Marxist-Leninist dialectical materialism, the research explores frequency, content, and presentation strategies across pro-Ukrainian, pro-Russian, and neutral media outlets. An initial dataset of 2,258 articles was collected through a Python-based web scraping tool, filtered down to 1,253 relevant articles. From this dataset, 399 articles were randomly selected for in-depth analysis, ensuring representation across three geopolitical alignments and key phases of the conflict. The analysis reveals significant differences in media strategies: pro-Ukrainian outlets emphasized military victories and humanitarian aspects, pro-Russian sources prioritized strategic justifications and propaganda narratives, while neutral platforms maintained analytical objectivity with a focus on balanced reporting. These findings underscore how geopolitical alignments shape media narratives during international conflicts, highlighting the strategic role of media framing, thematic focus, and multimodal presentation. The study provides insights into the interplay between digital media ecosystems and global political discourse, offering a foundation for further research on international media dynamics in conflict scenarios.
| Reference Key |
imported_1768940156_696fe27ce7991
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Dinh Trung Kien |
| Journal | International Journal of Science and Social Science Research |
| Year | 2024 |
| DOI |
10.5281/zenodo.14560420
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.