Screening Of Different Carbon Sources for Staphylococcus Aureus

Clicks: 2
ID: 310460
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #389 of 409 articles by views in International Journal of Science and Social Science Research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 409 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The aim of this study was to screen different carbon sources for Staphylococcus aureus to identify potential replacements for glucose. Glucose is a commonly used carbon source in microbial culture media, however, it can be expensive and may not be readily available in certain regions. In this study, a total of 6 different carbon sources were tested, including lactose, maltose, sucrose, fructose, glucose, n-hexane, toluene. The growth rate and biomass production of S. aureus were compared between each carbon source and glucose, which served as the control. The results showed that S. aureus was able to grow on all of the tested carbon sources, however, there were significant differences in the growth rates and biomass production between each carbon source. Specifically, fructose were found to be the most promising replacements for glucose, as they were able to support similar growth rates and biomass production as glucose.
Reference Key
imported_1768933041_696fc6b17ea83 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Indrani P. Bhattacharya
Journal International Journal of Science and Social Science Research
Year 2024
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.13358056
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.