Conceptualizing Dysstreamia: A Systematic Integrative Review of Algorithmic Exposure, Mood, and Minoritized Mental Health
Clicks: 1
ID: 310354
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #193 of 409 articles by views in International Journal of Science and Social Science Research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 409 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This review introduces and defines Dysstreamia, a chronic, platform-linked depressive-anxious mood state sustained by algorithmically reinforced exposure to distressing or identity-relevant content. Framed within behavioral psychology and Self-Determination Theory (SDT), the study examines how algorithmic design, attentional capture, and social comparison processes contribute to mood regulation and psychological need frustration in digital contexts. An integrative review with embedded qualitative meta-synthesis was conducted across peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025. Eligible studies investigated social media or digital platform use and depressive or anxious outcomes among racial and ethnic minoritized populations. Databases searched included PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Methodological quality was appraised using CASP, JBI, and MMAT tools. Data were extracted and synthesized thematically to identify recurring behavioral and cognitive-affective mechanisms. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Five consistent behavioral processes emerged: (1) algorithmic exposure to distressing or racialized content, (2) attentional capture and rumination, (3) social comparison and competence threat, (4) perceived loss of control over feeds, and (4) sleep disruption and vigilance. These mechanisms collectively reflect reinforcement loops that sustain low-to-moderate dysphoric affect. Dysstreamia explains how behavioral reinforcement, cognitive bias, and algorithmic design interact to produce persistent mood disturbance. The framework provides a foundation for developing culturally responsive screening tools, boundary-setting interventions, and digital-wellbeing education targeting behavioral regulation in online environments.
| Reference Key |
imported_1768931087_696fbf0f91479
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Brandy Williams |
| Journal | International Journal of Science and Social Science Research |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.5281/zenodo.17954586
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.