Economic Nationalism Vs. Globalization: Analyzing Policy Impacts On Trade

Clicks: 6
ID: 309703
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The ongoing debate between economic nationalism and globalization has significant implications for international trade and economic growth. Economic nationalism advocates for protectionist policies such as tariffs, subsidies, and import restrictions to shield domestic industries, while globalization promotes free trade, open markets, and economic integration. This paper critically analyzes the impact of these opposing policy approaches on trade dynamics, economic stability, and global supply chains. By examining case studies of countries that have embraced either economic nationalism or globalization, the research highlights the benefits and drawbacks of each approach. The findings suggest that while economic nationalism can safeguard local industries and employment, it may lead to trade wars and economic inefficiencies. Conversely, globalization enhances market access and economic interdependence but can expose domestic industries to foreign competition and economic vulnerabilities. The paper concludes that a balanced approach, incorporating selective protectionist measures while leveraging globalization’s benefits, may be the most effective trade policy strategy in the modern economy
Reference Key
dhull2025economic Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Dr. Manisha Dhull
Journal International Journal of Multidisciplinary Innovations & Studies
Year 2025
DOI
10.64675/jimis.v1.i1.2025.01
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.