Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability

Clicks: 230
ID: 30904
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #87 of 132 articles by views in forensic science international

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 132 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract is not available for this article.
Login to Search Abstract
Reference Key
martire2019forensicforensic Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Martire, K.
Journal forensic science international
Year 2019
DOI
10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109877
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.