The Pricing of Initial Public Offerings: Tests of Adverse-Selection and Signaling Theories

Clicks: 1
ID: 306305
1994
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #181 of 192 articles by views in review of financial studies

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 192 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We test the empirical implications of several models of IPO underpricing. Consistent with the winner's-curse hypothesis, we show that in markets where investors know a priori that they do not have to compete with informed investors, IPOs are not underpriced. We also show that IPOs underwritten by reputable investment banks experience significantly less underpricing and perform significantly better in the long run. We do not find empirical support for the signaling models that try to explain why firms underprice. In fact, we find that (1) firms that underprice more return to the reissue market less frequently, and for lesser amounts, than firms that underprice less, and (2) firms that underprice less experience higher earnings and pay higher dividends, contrary to the models' predictions.
Reference Key
openalex_W2004501718 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Roni Michaely, Wayne H. Shaw
Journal review of financial studies
Year 1994
DOI
10.1093/rfs/7.2.279
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.