Estimating the Error Rates of Diagnostic Tests

Clicks: 3
ID: 305640
1980
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #186 of 238 articles by views in biometrics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 238 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
It is often required to evaluate the accuracy of a new diagnostic test against a standard test with unknown error rates. If the two tests are applied simultaneously to the same individuals from two populations with different disease prevalences, then assuming conditional independence of the errors of the two tests, the error rates of both tests and the true prevalences in both populations can be estimated by a maximum likelihood procedure. Generalizations to several tests applied in several populations are also possible.
Reference Key
openalex_W2093268197 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Siu L. Hui, Stephen D. Walter
Journal biometrics
Year 1980
DOI
10.2307/2530508
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.