Calculation of Flame Ionization Detector Relative Response Factors Using the Effective Carbon Number Concept
Clicks: 3
ID: 305226
1985
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #14 of 14 articles by views in Journal of chromatographic science
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Equations are given for relating flame ionization detector relative response factors to the effective carbon number (ECN) of neat and derivatized components. The ECN approach can be used for calculating relative response factors in cases where pure materials are not available for detector calibration. Examples of this approach are given for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and oxygenated organics in neat form, alcohols and acids as the trimethylsilylated derivatives, and carbohydrates as the trimethylsilyl-oxime derivatives.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W2324621407
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | J. T. Scanlon, Donald E. Willis |
| Journal | Journal of chromatographic science |
| Year | 1985 |
| DOI |
10.1093/chromsci/23.8.333
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.