Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study

Clicks: 1
ID: 302976
2002
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #120 of 133 articles by views in International Journal of Epidemiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 133 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Background Excluding clinical trials reported in languages other than English from meta-analyses may introduce bias and reduce the precision of combined estimates of treatment effects. We examined the influence of trials published in languages other than English on combined estimates and conclusions of published meta-analyses.
Reference Key
openalex_W2154778977 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Peter Jüni, F Holenstein, Jonathan Sterne, Christopher Bartlett, Matthias Egger
Journal International Journal of Epidemiology
Year 2002
DOI
10.1093/ije/31.1.115
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/31.1.115
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.