Correspondence Analysis: A Neglected Multivariate Method

Clicks: 3
ID: 302625
1974
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #43 of 46 articles by views in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics)

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
R. A. Fisher's canonical analysis of contingency tables is shown to be applicable to incidence data as well as to contingency tables, and is accordingly designated by another author's name “correspondence analysis”. In a theoretical section, the method is shown to be equivalent to a special case of Hotelling's canonical correlation analysis and also to a scale‐free variant of principal components analysis. A practical example is examined, and a number of practical considerations discussed.
Reference Key
openalex_W134855704 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors M. O. Hill
Journal Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics)
Year 1974
DOI
10.2307/2347127
URL
https://doi.org/10.2307/2347127
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.