How estuaries work: A Charlotte Harbor example
Clicks: 4
ID: 302304
2003
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.9
/100
4 views
3 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #1,342 of 1,397 articles by views in journal of marine research
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,397 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We consider the time-averaged, estuarine circulation through a control volume analysis of its mechanical energy balance; hence the title of our paper: How estuaries work. The venue is the Charlotte Harbor on Florida's west coast, and the analysis medium is the primitive equation ECOM3D-si model. We are motivated by an estuary classification dilemma. Being that estuarine circulation is buoyancy driven by the horizontal salinity gradient, and that the gradient increases with increasing vertical mixing as the salinity isolines rotate from horizontal to vertical, it follows that an increase in mixing should lead to an increase in circulation. Yet, at some point, intermediate between partial and well mixed, the estuarine circulation decreases. We explore this conundrum by considering the sources and sinks of mechanical energy, derived from river, tide, and wind forcing, through analyses of pressure work, work by stresses operating on the surface and the bottom, work against buoyancy through mixing and advection, and turbulence energy production by velocity component shears. How the energy partitions between work against buoyancy (that sets the driving force) and turbulence production (that serves as a brake) provides an answer. Depending on tides and winds, if the incremental rate of turbulence production exceeds that of buoyancy work, the estuarine circulation slows. A useful measure is the ratio of buoyancy work to turbulence production. As this ratio increases so does the circulation, and conversely. For the Charlotte Harbor, tides alone cause peak circulation. Weak, oscillatory winds may add to this, but with increasing wind stress the tide and wind-averaged estuarine circulation decreases. Further exploration of these effects across Rayleigh number space with varying estuarine geometries and forcing functions may lead to improved understandings of estuary workings in general.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W2088603999
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert H. Weisberg, Lianyuan Zheng |
| Journal | journal of marine research |
| Year | 2003 |
| DOI |
10.1357/002224003771815981
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.