Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires

Clicks: 1
ID: 301423
2003
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #39 of 48 articles by views in public opinion quarterly

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Journal Article Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires: Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias Get access ALLYSON L. HOLBROOK, ALLYSON L. HOLBROOK Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar MELANIE C. GREEN, MELANIE C. GREEN Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar JON A. KROSNICK JON A. KROSNICK Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 67, Issue 1, March 2003, Pages 79–125, https://doi.org/10.1086/346010 Published: 01 March 2003
Reference Key
openalex_W2184015064 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Allyson L. Holbrook, Melanie C. Green, Jon A. Krosnick
Journal public opinion quarterly
Year 2003
DOI
10.1086/346010
URL
https://doi.org/10.1086/346010
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.