Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires

Clicks: 21
ID: 301423
2003
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #35 of 52 articles by views in public opinion quarterly

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Journal Article Telephone versus Face-to-Face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires: Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias Get access ALLYSON L. HOLBROOK, ALLYSON L. HOLBROOK Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar MELANIE C. GREEN, MELANIE C. GREEN Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar JON A. KROSNICK JON A. KROSNICK Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 67, Issue 1, March 2003, Pages 79–125, https://doi.org/10.1086/346010 Published: 01 March 2003
Reference Key
openalex_W2184015064 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal public opinion quarterly
Year 2003
DOI
10.1086/346010
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.