Assessing the accuracy of the maximum likelihood estimator: Observed versus expected Fisher information

Clicks: 4
ID: 300686
1978
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #22 of 188 articles by views in jurnal biometrika dan kependudukan

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 188 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper concerns normal approximations to the distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator in one-parameter families. The traditional variance approximation is 1/§, where θ is the maximum likelihood estimator and § is the expected total Fisher information. Many writers, including R. A. Fisher, have argued in favour of the variance estimate 1/I(x), where I(x) is the observed information, i.e. minus the second derivative of the log likelihood function at θ given data x. We give a frequentist justification for preferring 1/I(x) to 1/§. The former is shown to approximate the conditional variance of 8 given an appropriate ancillary statistic which to a first approximation is I(x). The theory may be seen to flow naturally from Fisher's pioneering papers on likelihood estimation. A large number of examples are used to supplement a small amount of theory. Our evidence indicates preference for the likelihood ratio method of obtaining confidence limits.
Reference Key
openalex_W2067342226 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Bradley Efron, D. V. Hinkley
Journal jurnal biometrika dan kependudukan
Year 1978
DOI
10.1093/biomet/65.3.457
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.