Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in Collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association

Clicks: 4
ID: 300514
2007
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #209 of 316 articles by views in european heart journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 316 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents summarize and evaluate all currently available evidence on a particular issue with the aim to assist physicians in selecting the best management strategies for a typical patient, suffering from a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk–benefit ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines are no substitutes for textbooks. The legal implications of medical guidelines have been discussed previously. A great number of Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents have been issued in recent years by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) as well as by other societies and organizations. Because of the impact on clinical practice, quality criteria for development of guidelines have been established in order to make all decisions transparent to the user. The recommendations for formulating and issuing ESC Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents can be found on the ESC website (http://www.escardio.org/knowledge/guidelines/rules). In brief, experts in the field are selected and undertake a comprehensive review of the published evidence for management and/or prevention of a given condition. A critical evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures is performed including the assessment of the risk/benefit ratio. Estimates of expected health outcomes for larger societies are included, where data exist. The level of evidence and the strength of recommendation of particular treatment options are weighed and graded according to pre-defined scales, as outlined in Tables 1 and  2 . View this table: Table 1 Classes of recommendations View this table: Table 2 Levels of evidence The experts of the writing panels have provided disclosure statements of all relationships they may have which might be perceived as real or potential sources of conflicts of interest. These disclosure forms are kept on file at the European Heart House, headquarters of the ESC. Any changes in conflict of interest that arise during the writing period must be notified …
Reference Key
openalex_W2229873756 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Panos Vardas, Angelo Auricchio, Jean Jacques Blanc, Claude Daubert, Helmut Drexler, Hugo Ector, Maurizio Gasparini, Cecilia Linde, Francisco Bello Morgado, Ali Oto, Richard Sutton, M. Trusz‐Gluza, A. Vahanian, A. John Camm, Raffaele De Caterina, V. Dean, Kenneth Dickstein, Christian Funck‐Brentano, G. Filippatos, Irene Hellemans, S. D. Kristensen, Keith McGregor, U Sechtem, Sigmund Silber, Michał Tendera, Petr Widimský, José Luis Zamorano, Silvia G. Priori, Carina Blomström‐Lundqvist, Michele Brignole, Josep Brugada Terradellas, A. John Camm, Patricia Castellano, John G.F. Cleland, Jerónimo Farré, Martin Fromer, J.‐Y. Le Heuzey, Gregory Y.H. Lip, José Luís Merino, A. S. Montenero, Philippe Ritter, M. J. Schalij, C. Stellbrink
Journal european heart journal
Year 2007
DOI
10.1093/eurheartj/ehm305
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.