Cotinine as a Biomarker of Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure
Clicks: 2
ID: 298912
1996
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
0.3
/100
2 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #18 of 34 articles by views in epidemiologic reviews
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A biomarker is desirable in quantitating systemic exposure both in smokers and nonsmokers to constituents of tobacco smoke. Self-report measures in smokers, such as cigarettes smoked per day, are highly imprecise owing to individual differences in how cigarettes are smoked, with ranges of nicotine intake per cigarette from 0.3 to 3.0 mg (1, 2). Self-report measures, such as hours per day exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) by nonsmokers, are also likely to be imprecise indicators of intake of tobacco smoke owing to variations in the number of cigarettes smoked, proximity of nonsmokers to smokers, room ventilation and other environmental characteristics, as well as individual differences in sensitivity to and/or concern about adverse effects of ETS. The optimal assessment of exposure to tobacco smoke would be by analysis of the concentrations of a component of smoke in the body fluids of an exposed individual— i.e., a biologic marker or biomarker. There are two broad questions that need to be considered in assessing the validity of a biomarker of tobacco smoke exposure. The first is how well does the concentration of a marker chemical in the air reflect exposure to toxic constituents of smoke that are of concern? The second is how well does a concentration of a particular chemical in a biologic fluid reflect an individual's intake of that chemical (or a related chemical) from tobacco smoke? The National Research Council (3) has proposed criteria for a valid marker of ETS in the air as follows: The marker 1) should be unique or nearly unique for ETS so that other sources are minor in comparison; 2) should be easily detectable; 3) should be emitted at similar rates for a variety of tobacco products; and 4)
| Reference Key |
openalex_W2142259952
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Neal L. Benowitz |
| Journal | epidemiologic reviews |
| Year | 1996 |
| DOI |
10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017925
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.