Survivorship Bias in Performance Studies
Clicks: 2
ID: 296229
1992
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #132 of 192 articles by views in review of financial studies
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 192 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Survivorship bias distorts results of virtually all current performance studies based on time series. Thus, researchers need to recognize and adjust for the presence of this bias. Not only does the bias affect the absolute performance measures; it also affects the relative rankings of managers over time.This presentation comes from the Blending Quantitative and Traditional Equity Analysis conference held in Boston, Massachusetts, on March 30-31, 1994.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W1992897607
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephen J. Brown, William Goetzmann, Roger G. Ibbotson, Stephen A. Ross |
| Journal | review of financial studies |
| Year | 1992 |
| DOI |
10.1093/rfs/5.4.553
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.