"That Was Pretty Powerful": a Qualitative Study of What Physicians Learn When Preparing for Their Maintenance-of-Certification Exams.
Clicks: 239
ID: 29600
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
75.9
/100
239 views
194 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #37 of 53 articles by views in Journal of General Internal Medicine
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
A key component of Maintenance of Certification (MOC) for family and internal medicine physicians is the requirement to pass a periodic examination of medical knowledge. Little is known about the effects of preparing for MOC exams on knowledge and practice.To understand how MOC exam preparation can affect knowledge and practice.Qualitative, semi-structured interviews, 45-60 min each, conducted by telephone at participants' convenience.A total of 80 primary care physicians from the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) and the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) who had recently taken an MOC exam; the sample purposefully selected to represent diversity of experiences with MOC exams and range of opinions about MOC, as well as diversity of participant backgrounds-gender, practice type, etc. APPROACH: Close analysis of physicians' accounts of what they learned when preparing for an MOC exam and how this knowledge affected their practice.Sixty-seven of 80 physicians stated they gained knowledge relevant to their practice. Sixty-three gave concrete examples of how this affected their practice, including direct changes to patient care (e.g., improved diagnosis or prescribing and reduced unnecessary testing) or less direct changes (e.g., improved ability to co-manage with other providers or communicate with patients). Physicians also described sharing what they learned with others, including peers and trainees.Interviews could have been affected by recall and/or social desirability bias, as well as researchers' role as board staff. Although we followed a recruitment protocol designed to mitigate recruitment acceptance bias, our findings may not be generalizable to wider groups of physicians.Most physicians from two primary care specialties interviewed reported ways in which studying for an MOC exam resulted in acquiring knowledge that was both relevant and beneficial to their patient care.
| Reference Key |
chesluk2019thatjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Chesluk, Benjamin;Gray, Bradley;Eden, Aimee;Hansen, Elizabeth;Lynn, Lorna;Peterson, Lars; |
| Journal | Journal of General Internal Medicine |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1007/s11606-019-05118-z
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.