Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, and Cardiovascular Disease
Clicks: 1
ID: 294612
2004
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #268 of 362 articles by views in the journal of clinical endocrinology & metabolism
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 362 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Obesity is rampant in the United States and is becoming increasing common worldwide. The increase in obesity prevalence is due to two major factors, plentiful supplies of inexpensive foods and sedentary jobs. Both are driven in no small part by technology. Thanks to technology, production of large quantities of cheap food is possible, and manual work is rapidly disappearing. In areas of the world in which these advances have not penetrated, obesity is not a significant public health problem. Thus, obesity is a direct result of technological advance and represents a major challenge for technological society. Obesity must also be recognized as a product of free society in which a multitude of food choices and job opportunities are available. A public health approach to the problem of obesity that restricts choice will not be acceptable to a free society. This fact puts increased responsibility on the individual to recognize the underlying causes of obesity and modify behavior to reduce the personal burden of obesity. That obesity extracts a social cost is well recognized. The costs in physical health are less well recognized by the general public. The foremost physical consequence of obesity is atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (1). A substantial portion of the ASCVD resulting from obesity is mediated by type 2 diabetes. But obesity is accompanied by several other risk factors for ASCVD. The sum of the risk factors that predisposes to ASCVD goes by the name of metabolic syndrome. In addition, obesity is accompanied by other medical complications other than ASCVD and diabetes; these include fatty liver, cholesterol gallstones, sleep apnea, osteoarthritis, and polycystic ovary disease. These disorders are commonly found in individuals who carry the metabolic syndrome. Obesity can be called an underlying risk factor for cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (2). It is called this because it raises the risk for ASCVD through other risk factors. The latter include the major risk factors (hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, hyperglycemia) and emerging risk factors (atherogenic dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, proinflammatory state, prothrombotic state). The relationship of obesity to major and emerging risk factors varies, depending on the genetic and acquired characteristics of individuals. The majority of obese persons who develop ASCVD typically have a clustering of major and emerging risk factors (metabolic syndrome). The constellation of major and emerging risk factors that make up the metabolic syndrome can be called metabolic risk factors (3). This article will first examine the variable characteristics of obesity; this will be followed by an examination of the relation of obesity to the metabolic syndrome; and finally, the relation of the metabolic syndrome to ASCVD will be reviewed. Categories of obesity Obesity can be defined as an excess of body fat. A surrogate marker for body fat content is the body mass index (BMI), which is determined by weight (kilograms) divided by height squared (square meters). In clinical terms, a BMI of 25–29 kg/m 2 is called overweight; higher BMIs (30 kg/m 2 ) are called obesity (4). A better way to define obesity would be in terms of percent total body fat (4). This can be measured by several methods (skin-fold thickness, bioelectrical impedance, underwater weighing). In terms of percent body fat, obesity can be defined as 25% or greater in men and 35% or greater in women. The measurement of percent body fat is rarely used in clinical practice, however, because of inconvenience and cost.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W2158103150
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Scott M. Grundy |
| Journal | the journal of clinical endocrinology & metabolism |
| Year | 2004 |
| DOI |
10.1210/jc.2004-0372
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.